//Laced

Customer support redesign.

Journey analysis · Ticket data strategy · Self-service design · New hires business case
Decision flow for the self-serve sale items modules: seller and listing states mapped to the module the customer sees
-22%
WISMO tickets
70,000+
Historical tickets tagged
2
Staff hires approved
-54%
Monday’s CS ticket backlog
//Context

Laced is a high-growth marketplace for rare, limited-release sneakers. Every pair passes through a five-stage warehouse authentication process, with up to 3,000 processed each day and customer support regularly stepping in between buyers and sellers

ProgrammeCustomer service operations redesign
RoleUX & Strategy Lead
SectorMarketplace & customer service
ScaleUp to 3,000 orders processed daily
RemitEnd-to-end support experience and operations
//The business problem

Support was becoming the bottleneck to growth

Daily sales were growing faster than the support team and tools could handle. Much of the workload came from issues that could have been prevented or self-served earlier in the journey, creating three clear problems.

01
No ticket tagging or insight

About 70,000 historical tickets were untagged, leaving the team reliant on anecdotal feedback and making it difficult to build evidence-based cases for improvement.

02
No customer-facing order tracking

Customers had little visibility of where their sneaker was in the five-stage authentication process, driving a high volume of avoidable WISMO tickets.

03
No weekend cover, created a weekly backlog

With no weekend support, every week started with a backlog already in place, hurting response times, team morale and customer confidence.

//My role
01.Ticket audit & interviews

Turning anecdotal problems into evidence

With no historical tagging, nobody could say what customers were actually contacting support about. I interviewed the support team to understand the recurring issues, then manually reviewed and categorised the latest 500 tickets to quantify demand and test those assumptions against real data.

67%
WISMO
Where is my order? (WISMO)67%
Returns, cancellations & sizing12%
Authentication queries9%
Payments & payouts7%
Everything else5%
02.Open and closed card sorting

Building a tagging system the whole team could use

I used open and closed card sorts with the support team to define a clear set of ticket categories in their own language. Where agents disagreed, labels were merged or renamed until the same ticket would be tagged consistently.

The final categories became mandatory in Zendesk, giving the team reliable demand data from that point forward.

6
Participants
8
Tag categories agreed
Closed card sort board: the same tickets re-placed, with disagreements showing as differently coloured cards
Open card sort board: tickets grouped into WISMO, Account, Money, Authentication, Returns, Damaged, Delivery and Catalogue
03.Keyword matching

Turning 70,000 historical tickets into usable data

I worked with a developer to apply the agreed tags retrospectively to around 70,000 historical tickets using the language customers actually used.

Keyword matching was not perfect, but it created a reliable enough baseline to show the scale of demand by topic and support evidence-based decisions.

Example keyword matches Tag
“where is my order”  /  “tracking”  /  “dispatched”  /  “delayed”  /  “not received”
WISMO
“return”  /  “wrong size”  /  “doesn’t fit”  /  “I don’t want”
Returns
“fake”  /  “passed”  /  “failed”  /  “verification”  /  “authentication”  /  “condition”
Authentication
“withdraw”  /  “money”  /  “payout”  /  “payment failed”  /  “card declined”
Money
04.Customer self-service strategy

Designing out avoidable support contact

The data showed two clear gaps. Sellers had no simple way to manage listings, while buyers had no way to track an order through authentication.

I designed a self-service portal around the same underlying order record, giving each user the information and actions they needed while keeping sensitive operational states internal.

-22%
WISMO tickets
Decision flow for the self-serve sale items modules: seller and listing states mapped to the exact module the customer sees
Seller settings: holiday mode and lowest-price notifications, both switched on
You need to ship: the seller queue with ship-by dates, delivery-label actions and in-transit states
Listing detail in the customer view: a failed authentication shown as a dated line in the listing history, with help routes underneath
WISMO FAQs moved to self-service
01Can I track my order?
02When will my order arrive?
03Has my order been dispatched?
04Why is my order delayed?
05My tracking says delivered, but I haven’t received it.
06Can I redirect the parcel to a collection point?
05.Operational resourcing

The case for two weekend support hires

The analysis kept surfacing the same issue. With no weekend cover, a backlog built up every week and the team started Monday already behind.

Previous requests for more staff had been rejected because there was no evidence to quantify the problem. I used the new ticket data to show the scale and operational impact of the backlog, building the case that secured two new weekend support hires.

Every weekend the inbox was unstaffed for 48 hours, resulting in Monday opening ×2.5 heavier than normal.

Mon
Tue
Wed
Thu
Fri
Sat
Sun

“We were fighting a never-ending backlog. No matter how hard we worked, the weekend intake meant we could never get ahead.”

Support team lead
The foundations of the business case
01
The backlog rebuilt every weekend

With no weekend cover, tickets accumulated for 48 hours and the team started every week already behind.

02
Response metrics worsened and morale dropped

The weekend gap inflated response times and left the team feeling they could never get ahead.

03
Weekend silence damaged customer trust

In a scam-sensitive market, two days without updates led some customers to assume something was wrong and cancel.

04
The gap had a measurable commercial cost

Using cancellation rates on orders left without updates, I quantified the revenue lost to the weekend gap and turned a staffing request into a commercial case.

What the hires changed
2
Weekend hires approved
-54%
Reduction to Monday’s backlog
0
Weekend hours unstaffed
//C-suite feedback
CEO & Founder
“Tom led the redesign of our internal authentication experience, turning a complex operational flow across multiple teams into clear blueprints that cut authentication times and reduced mistakes. Commercially focused and pragmatic, he balanced great user experience with what the business needed to move quickly. He was also instrumental in scaling our design and engineering capabilities, hiring and mentoring the team and consistently raising the bar, and I trusted him to own major initiatives from concept to delivery.”
Chris Gibbons
CEO & Founder · Laced
LinkedIn recommendations
Chief of Staff
“Tom was our inaugural hire within the product team and pivotal in scaling it to over 20 members. Leveraging his expertise we created the first service design blueprints for our warehouse operations, authenticating over 3,000 sneakers daily. What I valued most was his ability to navigate stakeholder relationships and provide clear, valuable insights. Strategically sound, he can go beyond the usual remit and take on the role of an advisor who really impacts an organisation’s efficacy.”
Gareth Olyott
Chief of Staff · Laced
LinkedIn recommendations
//The outcome

A support operation that reduced avoidable contact, created usable demand data and fixed the weekend backlog.

-22%
WISMO tickets
70,000+
Historical tickets tagged
2
Staff hires approved
-54%
Monday’s CS ticket backlog